A sustainable Developed Market rally? We are skeptical
call out “Though we see the same world, we see it through different eyes.”
— Virginia Woolfend call out
Perhaps lost in the noise of tariff headlines, a chorus of U.S. economic growth concerns, and the 10% correction of the S&P 500 Index has been the impressive 12% rally (as of March 17) in Developed Market ex U.S. Equities (DM) off its January 2025 low, as of 1/13/25. Is this the start of a sustained period of DM outperformance? We are skeptical.
Skeptical for a reason
Over the past nearly two decades, there have been seven similar periods where the skies appeared to clear for DM, and they outperformed —for a moment. Each time, calls that the bounce was the beginning of sustained DM outperformance were proven false within months. Will the current iteration follow the same pattern shown in Chart 1, or will it be different this time? No one knows for sure, but history has not been kind to investors betting on the latter.
Chart 1. Every DM outperformance bounce since 2007 has been short-lived
Sources: Bloomberg and Wells Fargo Investment Institute. Daily data. Indexed to 100 as of the short term peaks in the MSCI EAFE Index / S&P 500 Index ratio including October 21, 2009; October 14, 2010; December 28, 2012; April 27, 2015; May 17, 2017; January 4, 2021; January 18, 2023; and March 13, 2025. An index is unmanaged and not available for direct investment. Maximum amount of relative performance versus S&P 500/Minimum amount of relative outperformance versus S&P 500.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
What sparked the DM rally?
Stifling regulation, high energy costs, a lackluster economy, and 17-plus years of practically nonexistent earnings growth and returns (Chart 2) had depressed DM sentiment and valuations going into 2025. With the pessimistic pendulum swung so extremely negative, DM was primed to react to positive surprises. A string of modestly better-than-expected European economic data prints, an upward turn in consensus earnings expectations, and optimism over increased fiscal spending provided the surprise and the rally spark.
Chart 2. DM earnings per share (EPS) and price growth practically nonexistent for nearly 20 years
Sources: Bloomberg and Wells Fargo Investment Institute. Monthly data: December 31, 2007 – February 28, 2025. An index is unmanaged and not available for direct investment.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Markets like the fiscal shift
Last week, the German parliament voted to lift restrictions on government spending, to allocate 500 billion euros ($540.8 billion) to infrastructure spending, and to release defense spending from debt restrictions. In doing so, Germany is leading the continental economies in dramatically increasing government spending for the first time since before 2008. Outside of Germany, additional fiscal spending is expected to focus on defense outlays.
While the fiscal news has been welcomed by investors, we still have concerns: 1) Defense spending increase is a cost; what is the sustainable economic benefit that could meaningfully change the economic — and earnings — outlook? And the military hardware spending will not help the eurozone economy, to the extent that it imports U.S. weapons. 2) The extra expenditure on infrastructure is helpful, but how productive will the German infrastructure spending be? It’s only 500 billion euros — a useful down payment but not a promise of more to come. 3) Could increased spending reverse the disinflation progress and force higher short-term rates? 4) Are the countries with large government deficits (which now includes France) able to shoulder their share of the spending increase?
Focusing in on the impact to equities, an increase in defense spending certainly improves the earnings outlook of the likely beneficiaries, namely the Aerospace and Defense industry, but that industry is only 3% of the broad DM benchmark (the MSCI EAFE Index). Increased German infrastructure spending is also a welcome development, especially for the Germany Industrials sector, but that is a mere 2% of the DM benchmark. In short, the announced fiscal spending does little to move the needle on our overall DM earnings-per-share forecast.
Putting it all together
We are comfortable at neutral and a full allocation to DM. We believe the asset class offers decent quality at attractive valuations, and we suspect that sentiment is likely past its nadir. However, a lack of consistent growth, a resilient U.S. dollar, and tariff and trade uncertainty are headwinds. For investors who find themselves overweight the asset class, we suggest using this rally to trim DM exposure back to market weights and reallocate into U.S. Large Cap Equities or U.S. Mid Cap Equities, both currently favorable asset classes.
Reiterating our recent guidance changes
Last December, when we published our interest-rate outlook for 2025, we had anticipated an increase in U.S. Treasury yield volatility as new policies from the Trump administration began to get implemented. The combination of several catalysts has already caused 10-year U.S. Treasury yields to decline from their yearly high of 4.79% on January 14, 2025, to 4.28% as of March 18, 2025, as markets have anticipated a potential slowdown in economic growth and investors have rotated into high-quality fixed income.
This rotation has led to not only a pullback in equity prices but also an increase in high-quality longer-term fixed-income prices. At this time, we believe U.S. Treasury yields will continue to trade in a range near current levels. With our recent guidance changes, Adjusting fixed-income and equity positions published on March 11, 2025, we moved to a neutral stance in duration and U.S. Intermediate Term Taxable Fixed Income and to unfavorable on U.S. Short Term and Long Term Taxable Fixed Income, supporting our view that this was a good opportunity to take some gains in longer-term fixed income and move some capital toward U.S. Mid Cap Equities.
We still believe that 10-year U.S. Treasury yields will end the year between 4.50% and 5.00%. Our rate outlook is consistent with our expectation of higher growth and higher inflation, especially as we move through the second half of the year. In our view, the yield (income return) remains one of the biggest benefits of bonds at the moment, and we believe most U.S. fixed-income sectors are still displaying attractive starting yields.
Yield comparison amongst fixed-income sectors
Sources: Bloomberg and Wells Fargo Investment Institute, as of March 18, 2025. Data from March 18, 2015, to March 18, 2025. Please see back of the report for definitions of Bloomberg Indexes used. An index is unmanaged and not available for direct investment. Min, Max are the minimum and maximum index yield observed within in the 10-year period.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Commodities — time for a breather
2025 started on a hopeful note with investors looking forward to business-friendly tax cuts and deregulation from the new administration. Unfortunately, markets have, thus far, been mainly greeted by headlines regarding tariffs — which can put upward pressure on prices and downward pressure on the economy — business investment and consumer spending. Other factors that have boosted the appeal of commodities include policy (liquified natural gas prospects have boosted natural gas), geopolitics (the war in the Middle East has probably boosted both oil and gold), and a falling U.S. dollar (tends to be a positive for all commodities, but especially gold).
The Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index (BCOMTR) is up 7.68% year-to-date through March 17, besting the total return on both the S&P 500 Index (-3.23%) and the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (2.21%)1. While we remain favorable on Commodities, we believe it is time for a breather and most, if not all, of these factors should reverse to some degree. We suggest investors look for allocations that have grown larger-than-desired and rebalance toward other asset groups, like equities and fixed income. In addition, we believe that there is an opportunity to rebalance between our favorable sectors, from precious metals, which has been the standout in 2025, to energy, especially oil, which has lagged and may have room to catch up.
The chart suggests that the BCOMTR (258) remains in an uptrend. It should find support next at the 50-day moving average (253) followed by the 200-day moving average (239). Resistance sits at the recent high (261).
Commodities are close to overbought levels
Sources: Bloomberg and Wells Fargo Investment Institute. Daily data from March 18, 2022, through March 18, 2025. BCOMTR = Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index. SMAVG (50) = 50-day simple moving average. SMAVG (200) = 200-day simple moving average. RSI = relative strength index. An index is unmanaged and not available for direct investment.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
1 All numbers are year-to-date. 12/31/2024 to 3/17/2025.
Long-term drivers for infrastructure investments remain
Infrastructure assets are the networks and systems that provide essential services, ranging from roads and bridges to ports and airports, utilities, and power transmission, as well as pipelines, telecommunication towers, and data centers. The developed world generally enjoys more established, yet aging, infrastructure. According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, the average age of U.S. electric grids and water systems is over 40 years old, and 43% of roads and over 46,000 bridges in the U.S. are in poor conditions and deemed structurally deficient.
In addition, the growth and adoption of new technologies, including cloud computing and artificial intelligence, as well as the transition to clean and renewable energy will also require significant capital outlays. The World Bank’s Global Infrastructure Hub estimated that $51 trillion will be needed by 2040 to modernize aging systems and to accelerate energy transition and support the digital economy.
With the growing government budget deficits and increasingly constrained public finances, we expect that private capital will play a greater role in infrastructure investments. According to Preqin, from 2020 to 2024, private infrastructure has raised $625 billion in capital and has accumulated $350 billion in dry powder that is ready to be invested. Furthermore, in the second quarter of 2024, private infrastructure reached nearly $1.5 trillion in assets under management (see chart). We believe this growth will continue and can offer attractive opportunities for long-term qualified investors seeking potential for consistent returns to provide a hedge against rising inflation.
Private infrastructure investments have grown to nearly $1.5 trillion (from 2000 – 2024)
Sources: Preqin and Wells Fargo Investment Institute. Data as of June 30, 2024. The assets under management is calculated based on all private infrastructure funds that Preqin sourced and classified as infrastructure funds.
Alternative investments, such as hedge funds, private equity, private debt and private real estate funds are not appropriate for all investors and are only open to “accredited” or “qualified” investors within the meaning of U.S. securities laws.
Cash Alternatives and Fixed Income
Most Unfavorable |
Unfavorable |
Neutral |
Favorable |
Most Favorable |
intentionally blank
|
- U.S. Long Term Taxable Fixed Income
- U.S. Short Term Taxable Fixed Income
|
- Cash Alternatives
- Developed Market Ex-U.S. Fixed Income
- Emerging Market Fixed Income
- High Yield Taxable Fixed Income
- U.S. Intermediate Term Taxable Fixed Income
|
intentionally blank
|
intentionally blank
|
Equities
Most Unfavorable |
Unfavorable |
Neutral |
Favorable |
Most Favorable |
intentionally blank
|
|
- Developed Market Ex-U.S. Equities
- U.S. Small Cap Equities
|
- U.S. Large Cap Equities
- U.S. Mid Cap Equities
|
intentionally blank
|
Real Assets
Most Unfavorable |
Unfavorable |
Neutral |
Favorable |
Most Favorable |
intentionally blank
|
intentionally blank
|
|
|
intentionally blank
|
Alternative Investments**
Most Unfavorable |
Unfavorable |
Neutral |
Favorable |
Most Favorable |
intentionally blank
|
intentionally blank
|
- Hedge Funds—Equity Hedge
- Hedge Funds—Relative Value
- Private Equity
- Private Debt
|
- Hedge Funds—Event Driven
- Hedge Funds—Macro
|
intentionally blank
|
Source: Wells Fargo Investment Institute, March 24, 2025.
*Tactical horizon is 6-18 months
**Alternative investments are not appropriate for all investors. They are speculative and involve a high degree of risk that is appropriate only for those investors who have the financial sophistication and expertise to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in a fund and for which the fund does not represent a complete investment program. Please see end of report for important definitions and disclosures.